My Daughter’s A Cocksucker is an explicit sex work featuring a number of very similar scenes in which young women perform acts of fellatio on men (shot so their faces are not seen) while frequently looking into the camera and asking questions of the viewer such as ‘are you proud of me now Daddy’, 'Am I a good little cocksucker daddy?', 'My older sister isn't as good as this, is she daddy? Mommy taught me well', 'Am I good enough to teach the little sister?' and 'are you jacking off to your little princess?’. The female performers also make comments to the viewer such as 'Daddy always likes it when I choke' , 'Daddy told me to do it just like this' and 'Daddy always said a wet blow job's the best blow job'.The context makes it clear that ‘Daddy’ is being used to refer to a familial relationship and not as mere term of endearment for an older lover. The Board’s judgement is that in this work the dialogue encourages the male viewer to be aroused by, among other things, the idea of instructing and watching his daughter in the act of fellatio. This effect is potentially heightened by the implication that the daughter also finds this paternal interest arousing. The Board has concluded that such sequences constitute ‘material (including dialogue) likely to encourage an interest in sexually abusive activity (for example, paedophilia, incest or rape)…’The work also features a number of sequences (including in the ‘bonus scene’, which does not feature dialogue of the nature described above) in which women gag and choke during ‘deep throat’ fellatio while their heads are firmly held by the male performer, preventing them from easily ending the activity. The evident discomfort of the female performer is presented as, at best, an irrelevance or, at worst, as a feature designed to heighten the arousal of some viewers. In the view of the Board these sequences also constitute ‘material … likely to encourage an interest in sexually abusive activity’.It is therefore the Board’s carefully considered view that to issue a certificate to this work, even if confined to adults and supplied to them only in licensed sex shops, would be inconsistent with the Board’s Guidelines, would risk potential harm and would be unacceptable to the public. The Board considered whether its concerns could be dealt with through cuts. However, it concluded that a central concept of the work was unacceptable and that the cuts required to remove all the unacceptable content would be extensive.