Judy Justice

There is use of very mild bad language ('God').

There is infrequent muted but identifiable use of strong language (‘f**k’). Milder terms include ‘God’.

Moderate violence includes video footage of an altercation between a man and a couple in which punches are thrown and one party threatens to hit the other with a brick.

There is brief cctv footage in of a couple smoking marijuana joints in a backyard. There are references to people smoking marijuana.

It contains no material likely to offend or harm.

A woman becomes frustrated and upset for her daughter when she fears that she cannot pay for her braces. There are also references to the child feeling stuck in the middle of her feuding parents.

There are non-graphic verbal references to a 10-year-old boy having accessed “smutty videos” and “disturbing” adult content - implied to be pornographic in nature - on a phone.

There is very mild bad language ('God').

N/A

There is a brief verbal stalking reference.

There are undetailed verbal references to a man's involvement in two 'domestic violence cases'.

There are mild verbal references to violence which include punching and choking.

There is very mild bad language ('God').

There is obscured, but mouthed, strong language ('motherf**king').

There are verbal references to domestic abuse.

There is implied strong language ('f**k'), as well as milder terms ('moron').

Judy uses a phrase referring to "peeing" on her leg.

There is no material likely to offend or harm.

It contains no material likely to offend or harm.

There is very mild bad language ('damn').

The episode contains no material likely to offend or harm.

There is a undetailed references to a couple's 'intimate relationship' and to animal breeding.

It contains no material likely to offend or harm.

There is a brief verbal reference to a woman’s boyfriend having “put his hands on her”. In another sequence one woman is accused of attacking another and pulling her hair, causing the alleged victim to retaliate in kind.

Mild bad language includes the term ‘LMAO’, in addition to partially muted use of the term ‘ass’. Milder terms include ‘OMG’ and ‘God’. There is also sight of blurred bad language in text, which is completely obscured.

There are verbal refernces to cyber bullying when a woman posts pictures and a video of her client onto social media, claiming she had not paid her.

There are undetailed references to the murder of a teenage boy.

A woman accuses her husband of assaulting her. No detail is provided, and it emerges that he had previously been found innocent of this.

A man of Chinese heritage says that he was concerned by the rise in Asian hate crime, which was the reason he sought to purchase a firearm for protection.

A man is asked if a conviction he received as a juvenile was drug related.

There is very mild bad language ('God').

There are occasional oblique verbal references to sex.

There are frequent mild verbal references to a man’s struggles with alcoholism and his treatment in a rehab facility. There are also multiple references to the man having accidentally urinated on a sofa while drunk.

There is very mild bad language ('God').

A woman accuses a man of pushing her over and punching her. We see a photo of a bloodshot eye allegedly resulting from the assault.

A couple are accused of dealing and smoking marijuana, and there is a reference to 'bags of weed' left out on the table. Drug misuse is not condoned.

N/A

There are mild verbal references to a sexual relationship.

There is very mild bad language ('God').

There are undetailed references to domestic abuse in a defendant's statement.

There is real video footage of two bloodied teenagers after a drunk driving accident.

There are brief verbal drug references.

N/A

There is an undetailed reference to a woman 'sleeping with' a man.

There is no material likely to offend or harm.

There are undetailed references to a domestic incident between a woman and her sister's husband, who allegedly threatened and assaulted her. It is also alleged that a woman threatened to set her dogs on her sister's cats.

It contains no material likely to offend or harm.

There are infrequent verbal references to a man having allegedly grabbed his former partner’s hands during an argument, causing a sprained finger. There is also a very brief reference to a woman having allegedly ‘neglected’ her child.

A man repeatedly accuses a woman of 'substance abuse' and having a 'problem with drug use', but there is no further verbal detail.

There is infrequent use of very mild bad language (‘God’, ‘damn’).

It contains no material likely to offend or harm.

There are verbal references to a large dog attacking smaller dogs, causing there to be 'blood all over the place'.

There is no material likely to offend or harm.

There is no material likely to offend or harm.

A boy describes an attack on his dog by a pitbull, detailing that it was grabbed by the neck and leg, and shaken, and that the pitbull only released its hold after it was punched by a man. There are no details given of the injuries sustained by the victim of the attack.

There is no material likely to offend or harm.

N/A

There are undetailed references animal cruelty in which it is alleged a woman running a puppy mill has caused the deaths of a number of puppies. No other evidence of abuse surfaces during the hearing to back up these claims. It is later revealed her breeding practices occurred within the timeframe recommended by the American Kennel Club.

A woman reports to another person's point that: "I dont give a rat's...behind".

There are references to a woman breaching a restraining order, damaging her ex's car and robbing his house. There are also undetailed references to a man 'laying his hands' in his ex partner.

N/A

n/a

There are brief references to a man harassing a woman via text because she owed him money.

There is very mild bad language ('hell').

There is no material likely to offend or harm.

In a discussion about people in relationships being careful about the financial arrangements they make between each other, a comment is made about contracts being "not sexy, but smart".

Mild threat includes sight of a growling dog leaping at a man. There is a reference to a woman who died and was eaten by the dog she was caring for.

Mild injury detail includes sight of scabbed cuts and scratches on a man's arm and knee.

There are very mild sex references including to a couple's infidelities.

In a scene of very mild emotional upset, a man discusses the death of his support cat.

There is no material likely to offend or harm.

There a references to an individual smoking marijuana whilst driving, which is clearly condemned by others in the episode.

There is real video footage of a woman hitting a person's car repeatedly with a broomstick. There are references to a woman's foot being run over and her tires slashed.

There are references to a woman being high on weed whilst driving.

There are undetailed references to being a sugar daddy.

There are references to a man holding a gun in his hand whilst arguing with someone, and that person feeling threatened.

There is use of mild bad language ('crappy').

An individual is asked whether he has ever had sex with the woman taking him to court.

A judge questions whether shots were fired at a wedding, but this turns out not to be the case.

There is no material likely to offend or harm.

There are implied uses of strong language ('f**k') in which the sound has been dipped.

The episode features mild bad language ('screw you').

There are references to marijuana and cannabis as a man says he cultivates the drug for a living.

A man claims that his brother spread a rumour online that he 'impregnates Hispanic women' in Mexico.

There are photographs of cuts and bruises on a person's body in the aftermath of a car accident.

There are references to a woman's child being traumatised after a car accident.

There are references to sexual harassment, such as, "He would walk around the house in his underwear ... and he patted my behind when he walked past me."

There are references to an attack on a small dog by two pit bulls. Video evidence is shown of the larger dogs confronting the smaller one, but footage of contact between the animals remains off-screen. A photograph gives brief sight of the canine victim of the attack with a small amount of blood on its coat.